BLU Studio C vs LG KT770

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthKT770: 20.9 mm narrowerKT770: 51.5 mm · Studio C: 72.4 mm
• Screen diagonalKT770: 2.2 in smaller diagonalKT770: 2.8 in · Studio C: 5 in
• DepthStudio C: 6.4 mm thinnerStudio C: 9.4 mm · KT770: 15.8 mm
• HeightKT770: 33 mm shorterKT770: 111 mm · Studio C: 144 mm
• Release year2015 / 2009Studio C: 2015 · KT770: 2009

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio C

   Height

   144 mm+33 mm versus KT770

   Width

   72.4 mm+20.9 mm versus KT770

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   172 g

2. 2. KT770

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   51.5 mm

   Depth

   15.8 mm+6.4 mm versus Studio C

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio C 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. KT770 2.8 in · 5:3 About 22.3 cm² rectangular area

Studio C has approximately 208.8% more rectangular screen area than KT770.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.