BLU Studio C vs Meizu MX

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightMX: 33 g lighterMX: 139 g · Studio C: 172 g
• WidthMX: 9.1 mm narrowerMX: 63.3 mm · Studio C: 72.4 mm
• Screen diagonalMX: 1 in smaller diagonalMX: 4 in · Studio C: 5 in
• DepthStudio C: 0.9 mm thinnerStudio C: 9.4 mm · MX: 10.3 mm
• HeightMX: 22.7 mm shorterMX: 121.3 mm · Studio C: 144 mm
• Release year2015 / 2011Studio C: 2015 · MX: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio C

   Height

   144 mm+22.7 mm versus MX

   Width

   72.4 mm+9.1 mm versus MX

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   172 g

2. 2. MX

   Height

   121.3 mm

   Width

   63.3 mm

   Depth

   10.3 mm+0.9 mm versus Studio C

   Weight

   139 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio C 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. MX 4 in · 3:2 About 47.6 cm² rectangular area

Studio C has approximately 44.7% more rectangular screen area than MX.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.