BLU Studio C vs Panasonic Eluga A2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• ChipsetMediatek MT6582 (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6735M (28 nm)Studio C: Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) · Eluga A2: Mediatek MT6735M (28 nm)
• DepthEluga A2: 0.5 mm thinnerEluga A2: 8.9 mm · Studio C: 9.4 mm
• Release year2015 / 2016Studio C: 2015 · Eluga A2: 2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio C

   Height

   144 mm

   Width

   72.4 mm

   Depth

   9.4 mm+0.5 mm versus Eluga A2

   Weight

   172 g

2. 2. Eluga A2

   Height

   143.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   8.9 mm

   Weight

   167.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio C 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Eluga A2 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.