BLU Studio Max vs Energizer Energy E220

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Energizer Energy E220 is 57 g lighter than BLU Studio Max.

  BLU Studio Max — Weight: 169 g. Energizer Energy E220 — Weight: 112 g.

• Width

  Energizer Energy E220 is 16.6 mm narrower than BLU Studio Max.

  BLU Studio Max — Width: 75.6 mm. Energizer Energy E220 — Width: 59 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Energizer Energy E220 is 3.3 in smaller than that of BLU Studio Max.

  BLU Studio Max — Screen diagonal: 5.5 in. Energizer Energy E220 — Screen diagonal: 2.2 in.

• Chipset

  BLU Studio Max uses the Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) chipset. Energizer Energy E220 uses the Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm) chipset.

• Depth

  BLU Studio Max is 8 mm thinner than Energizer Energy E220.

  BLU Studio Max — Depth: 8.5 mm. Energizer Energy E220 — Depth: 16.5 mm.

• Height

  Energizer Energy E220 is 34.8 mm shorter than BLU Studio Max.

  BLU Studio Max — Height: 153.8 mm. Energizer Energy E220 — Height: 119 mm.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. BLU Studio Max

   Height:

   153.8 mm +34.8 mm versus Energizer Energy E220

   Width:

   75.6 mm +16.6 mm versus Energizer Energy E220

   Depth:

   8.5 mm

   Weight:

   169 g

2. 2. Energizer Energy E220

   Height:

   119 mm

   Width:

   59 mm

   Depth:

   16.5 mm +8 mm versus BLU Studio Max

   Weight:

   112 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. BLU Studio Max

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

2. 2. Energizer Energy E220

   Screen diagonal:

   2.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   15 cm²

BLU Studio Max has approximately 456.4% more rectangular screen area than Energizer Energy E220.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.