BLU Studio Max vs Xiaomi Mi A1

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Chipset

  Studio Max:

  Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm)

  Mi A1:

  Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 (14 nm)

• Rear camera layout

  Studio Max:

  Single

  Mi A1:

  Dual

• Depth

  Mi A1: 1.2 mm thinner

  Studio Max:

  8.5 mm

  Mi A1:

  7.3 mm

• Release year

  Studio Max:

  2016

  Mi A1:

  2017

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio Max

   Height:

   153.8 mm

   Width:

   75.6 mm

   Depth:

   8.5 mm +1.2 mm versus Mi A1

2. 2. Mi A1

   Height:

   155.4 mm

   Width:

   75.8 mm

   Depth:

   7.3 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio Max

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

2. 2. Mi A1

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.