BLU Studio Touch vs Nokia 3.1 C

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightStudio Touch: 15 g lighterStudio Touch: 141 g · 3.1 C: 156 g
• Screen diagonalStudio Touch: 0.45 in smaller diagonalStudio Touch: 5 in · 3.1 C: 5.45 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6735P (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429Studio Touch: Mediatek MT6735P (28 nm) · 3.1 C: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
• DepthStudio Touch: 1 mm thinnerStudio Touch: 8.4 mm · 3.1 C: 9.4 mm
• HeightStudio Touch: 9.5 mm shorterStudio Touch: 143.2 mm · 3.1 C: 152.7 mm
• Release year2016 / 2019Studio Touch: 2016 · 3.1 C: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio Touch

   Height

   143.2 mm

   Width

   71.2 mm

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   141 g

2. 2. 3.1 C

   Height

   152.7 mm

   Width

   71.9 mm

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   156 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.