BLU Studio X Mini vs Lava Iris 465

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightStudio X Mini: 24 g lighterStudio X Mini: 122 g · Iris 465: 146 g
• WidthStudio X Mini: 2.2 mm narrowerStudio X Mini: 65.8 mm · Iris 465: 68 mm
• DepthIris 465: 0.8 mm thinnerIris 465: 10 mm · Studio X Mini: 10.8 mm
• Release year2016 / 2015Studio X Mini: 2016 · Iris 465: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio X Mini

   Height

   133.7 mm

   Width

   65.8 mm

   Depth

   10.8 mm+0.8 mm versus Iris 465

   Weight

   122 g

2. 2. Iris 465

   Height

   134.4 mm

   Width

   68 mm+2.2 mm versus Studio X Mini

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   146 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio X Mini 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Iris 465 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.