Celkon A359 vs Oppo Find

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightA359: 29.5 g lighterA359: 95.5 g · Find: 125 g
• WidthA359: 3.7 mm narrowerA359: 62.3 mm · Find: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalA359: 0.8 in smaller diagonalA359: 3.5 in · Find: 4.3 in
• DepthFind: 3.7 mm thinnerFind: 6.7 mm · A359: 10.4 mm
• HeightA359: 10.5 mm shorterA359: 114.5 mm · Find: 125 mm
• Release year2015 / 2012A359: 2015 · Find: 2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A359

   Height

   114.5 mm

   Width

   62.3 mm

   Depth

   10.4 mm+3.7 mm versus Find

   Weight

   95.5 g

2. 2. Find

   Height

   125 mm+10.5 mm versus A359

   Width

   66 mm+3.7 mm versus A359

   Depth

   6.7 mm

   Weight

   125 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A359 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Find 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area

Find has approximately 44.3% more rectangular screen area than A359.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.