Celkon A900 vs Oppo A9

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightA900: 5 g lighterA900: 185 g · A9: 190 g
• WidthA9: 5.6 mm narrowerA9: 76.1 mm · A900: 81.7 mm
• Screen diagonalA900: 1.53 in smaller diagonalA900: 5 in · A9: 6.53 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualA900: Single · A9: Dual
• DepthA9: 1.9 mm thinnerA9: 8.3 mm · A900: 10.2 mm
• HeightA900: 9.2 mm shorterA900: 152.8 mm · A9: 162 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A900

   Height

   152.8 mm

   Width

   81.7 mm+5.6 mm versus A9

   Depth

   10.2 mm+1.9 mm versus A9

   Weight

   185 g

2. 2. A9

   Height

   162 mm+9.2 mm versus A900

   Width

   76.1 mm

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   190 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A900 5 in · 5:3 About 71.2 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. A9 6.53 in · 19.5:9 About 104.7 cm² rectangular area

A9 has approximately 47.1% more rectangular screen area than A900.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.