Celkon A95 vs Nokia 3.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightA95: 77 g lighterA95: 104 g · 3.2: 181 g
• WidthA95: 15.7 mm narrowerA95: 60.5 mm · 3.2: 76.2 mm
• Screen diagonalA95: 3.06 in smaller diagonalA95: 3.2 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6575 (40 nm) / Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429A95: Mediatek MT6575 (40 nm) · 3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
• Depth3.2: 2.9 mm thinner3.2: 8.6 mm · A95: 11.5 mm
• HeightA95: 47.4 mm shorterA95: 112 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A95

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   60.5 mm

   Depth

   11.5 mm

   Weight

   104 g

2. 2. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2