Celkon Win 400 vs Sharp Aquos D10

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightWin 400: 44.4 g lighterWin 400: 120.6 g · Aquos D10: 165 g
• WidthWin 400: 9.2 mm narrowerWin 400: 65 mm · Aquos D10: 74.2 mm
• Screen diagonalWin 400: 1.99 in smaller diagonalWin 400: 4 in · Aquos D10: 5.99 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)Win 400: Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) · Aquos D10: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualWin 400: Single · Aquos D10: Dual
• DepthAquos D10: 2.3 mm thinnerAquos D10: 8 mm · Win 400: 10.3 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Win 400

   Height

   125.4 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   10.3 mm

   Weight

   120.6 g

2. 2. Aquos D10

   Height

   148.2 mm

   Width

   74.2 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   165 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.