Celkon Win 400 vs Sharp Aquos R2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightWin 400: 60.4 g lighterWin 400: 120.6 g · Aquos R2: 181 g
• WidthWin 400: 9 mm narrowerWin 400: 65 mm · Aquos R2: 74 mm
• Screen diagonalWin 400: 2 in smaller diagonalWin 400: 4 in · Aquos R2: 6 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Win 400: Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) · Aquos R2: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualWin 400: Single · Aquos R2: Dual
• DepthAquos R2: 1.3 mm thinnerAquos R2: 9 mm · Win 400: 10.3 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Win 400

   Height

   125.4 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   10.3 mm

   Weight

   120.6 g

2. 2. Aquos R2

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   74 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   181 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.