Celkon Win 400 vs Sharp Aquos R2 compact

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightWin 400: 14.4 g lighterWin 400: 120.6 g · Aquos R2 compact: 135 g
• WidthAquos R2 compact: 1 mm narrowerAquos R2 compact: 64 mm · Win 400: 65 mm
• Screen diagonalWin 400: 1.2 in smaller diagonalWin 400: 4 in · Aquos R2 compact: 5.2 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Win 400: Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm) · Aquos R2 compact: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
• DepthAquos R2 compact: 1 mm thinnerAquos R2 compact: 9.3 mm · Win 400: 10.3 mm
• HeightWin 400: 5.6 mm shorterWin 400: 125.4 mm · Aquos R2 compact: 131 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Win 400

   Height

   125.4 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   10.3 mm

   Weight

   120.6 g

2. 2. Aquos R2 compact

   Height

   131 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   135 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Y8p vs Aquos R2 compact