Coolpad Mega vs Energizer Energy E220

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightEnergy E220: 31 g lighterEnergy E220: 112 g · Mega: 143 g
• WidthEnergy E220: 17.8 mm narrowerEnergy E220: 59 mm · Mega: 76.8 mm
• Screen diagonalEnergy E220: 3.3 in smaller diagonalEnergy E220: 2.2 in · Mega: 5.5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6735P (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm)Mega: Mediatek MT6735P (28 nm) · Energy E220: Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm)
• DepthMega: 8.6 mm thinnerMega: 7.9 mm · Energy E220: 16.5 mm
• HeightEnergy E220: 34 mm shorterEnergy E220: 119 mm · Mega: 153 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Mega

   Height

   153 mm

   Width

   76.8 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   143 g

2. 2. Energy E220

   Height

   119 mm

   Width

   59 mm

   Depth

   16.5 mm

   Weight

   112 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.