Coolpad Porto vs Plum Trigger Plus

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthTrigger Plus: 5.4 mm narrowerTrigger Plus: 62.4 mm · Porto: 67.8 mm
• Screen diagonalTrigger Plus: 1.2 in smaller diagonalTrigger Plus: 3.5 in · Porto: 4.7 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm)Porto: Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm) · Trigger Plus: Mediatek MT6572 (28 nm)
• DepthPorto: 3.5 mm thinnerPorto: 8 mm · Trigger Plus: 11.5 mm
• HeightTrigger Plus: 21 mm shorterTrigger Plus: 118 mm · Porto: 139 mm
• Release year2015 / 2014Porto: 2015 · Trigger Plus: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Porto

   Height

   139 mm

   Width

   67.8 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   119 g

2. 2. Trigger Plus

   Height

   118 mm

   Width

   62.4 mm

   Depth

   11.5 mm

   Weight

   120 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.