Coolpad Roar vs Motorola E895

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE895: 14.4 mm narrowerE895: 51 mm · Roar: 65.4 mm
• Screen diagonalE895: 2.3 in smaller diagonalE895: 2.2 in · Roar: 4.5 in
• DepthRoar: 14 mm thinnerRoar: 9 mm · E895: 23 mm
• HeightE895: 40 mm shorterE895: 93 mm · Roar: 133 mm
• Release year2015 / 2005Roar: 2015 · E895: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Roar

   Height

   133 mm+40 mm versus E895

   Width

   65.4 mm+14.4 mm versus E895

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. E895

   Height

   93 mm

   Width

   51 mm

   Depth

   23 mm+14 mm versus Roar

   Weight

   127 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Roar 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E895 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area

Roar has approximately 272.5% more rectangular screen area than E895.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.