Coolpad Roar vs Nokia 1.3

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthRoar: 5.8 mm narrowerRoar: 65.4 mm · 1.3: 71.2 mm
• Screen diagonalRoar: 1.21 in smaller diagonalRoar: 4.5 in · 1.3: 5.71 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6580 (28 nm) / Qualcomm QM215 (28 nm)Roar: Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) · 1.3: Qualcomm QM215 (28 nm)
• HeightRoar: 14.3 mm shorterRoar: 133 mm · 1.3: 147.3 mm
• Release year2015 / 2020Roar: 2015 · 1.3: 2020

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Roar

   Height

   133 mm

   Width

   65.4 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. 1.3

   Height

   147.3 mm

   Width

   71.2 mm

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   155 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.