Dell Mini 3i vs O2 Xphone II

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Xphone II: 14.4 mm narrower

  Mini 3i:

  58.4 mm

  Xphone II:

  44 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Xphone II: 1.3 in smaller diagonal

  Mini 3i:

  3.5 in

  Xphone II:

  2.2 in

• Depth

  Mini 3i: 6.3 mm thinner

  Mini 3i:

  11.7 mm

  Xphone II:

  18 mm

• Height

  Xphone II: 15 mm shorter

  Mini 3i:

  122 mm

  Xphone II:

  107 mm

• Release year

  Mini 3i:

  2009

  Xphone II:

  2004

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Mini 3i

   Height:

   122 mm +15 mm versus Xphone II

   Width:

   58.4 mm +14.4 mm versus Xphone II

   Depth:

   11.7 mm

2. 2. Xphone II

   Height:

   107 mm

   Width:

   44 mm

   Depth:

   18 mm +6.3 mm versus Mini 3i

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Mini 3i

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

2. 2. Xphone II

   Xphone II: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.