Energizer Energy E401 vs OnePlus 3T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalEnergy E401: 1.5 in smaller diagonalEnergy E401: 4 in · 3T: 5.5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6580M (28 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm)Energy E401: Mediatek MT6580M (28 nm) · 3T: Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 (14 nm)
• Release year2019 / 2016Energy E401: 2019 · 3T: 2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Energy E401

   Height

   Unknown

   Width

   Unknown

   Depth

   Unknown

   Weight

   Unknown

   Unavailable dimensions are omitted from the drawing.

2. 2. 3T

   Height

   152.7 mm

   Width

   74.7 mm

   Depth

   7.4 mm

   Weight

   158 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Energy E401 4 in · 16:9 About 44.1 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 3T 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area

3T has approximately 89.1% more rectangular screen area than Energy E401.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.