Eten glofiish M800 vs Nokia E71

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  E71: 51 g lighter

  glofiish M800:

  178 g

  E71:

  127 g

• Depth

  E71: 8.4 mm thinner

  glofiish M800:

  18.4 mm

  E71:

  10 mm

• Release year

  glofiish M800:

  2007

  E71:

  2008

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. glofiish M800

   Height:

   113.8 mm

   Width:

   57.8 mm

   Depth:

   18.4 mm +8.4 mm versus E71

2. 2. E71

   Height:

   114 mm

   Width:

   57 mm

   Depth:

   10 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. glofiish M800

   glofiish M800: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. E71

   Screen diagonal:

   2.36 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.2 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.