Fujitsu Siemens T830 vs Nokia E75

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Nokia E75 is 51 g lighter than Fujitsu Siemens T830.

  Fujitsu Siemens T830 — Weight: 190 g. Nokia E75 — Weight: 139 g.

• Width

  Nokia E75 is 14 mm narrower than Fujitsu Siemens T830.

  Fujitsu Siemens T830 — Width: 64 mm. Nokia E75 — Width: 50 mm.

• Depth

  Nokia E75 is 6.6 mm thinner than Fujitsu Siemens T830.

  Fujitsu Siemens T830 — Depth: 21 mm. Nokia E75 — Depth: 14.4 mm.

• Height

  Nokia E75 is 14.2 mm shorter than Fujitsu Siemens T830.

  Fujitsu Siemens T830 — Height: 126 mm. Nokia E75 — Height: 111.8 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Fujitsu Siemens T830 is 2006. The recorded release year for Nokia E75 is 2009.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Fujitsu Siemens T830

   Height:

   126 mm +14.2 mm versus Nokia E75

   Width:

   64 mm +14 mm versus Nokia E75

   Depth:

   21 mm +6.6 mm versus Nokia E75

   Weight:

   190 g

2. 2. Nokia E75

   Height:

   111.8 mm

   Width:

   50 mm

   Depth:

   14.4 mm

   Weight:

   139 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Fujitsu Siemens T830

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   18.6 cm²

2. 2. Nokia E75

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

Fujitsu Siemens T830 has approximately 4.2% more rectangular screen area than Nokia E75.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.