You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<
  1. Home
  2. Haier U69 vs TECNO Camon CX

Haier U69 vs TECNO Camon CX

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

Haier U69

Haier U69

Replace U69
Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

    Remove U69
    + Add a third phone
    Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

      Key differences

      Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

      • WeightU69: 39 g lighterU69: 111 g · Camon CX: 150 g
      • WidthU69: 20.8 mm narrowerU69: 55 mm · Camon CX: 75.8 mm
      • Screen diagonalU69: 2.5 in smaller diagonalU69: 3 in · Camon CX: 5.5 in
      • DepthCamon CX: 6.6 mm thinnerCamon CX: 5.6 mm · U69: 12.2 mm
      • HeightU69: 42.8 mm shorterU69: 110 mm · Camon CX: 152.8 mm
      • Release year2010 / 2017U69: 2010 · Camon CX: 2017

      Physical size

      Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

      Front
      U69: 110 × 55 mm 1 Camon CX: 152.8 × 75.8 mm 2
      Side
      U69: 110 × 12.2 mm 1 Camon CX: 152.8 × 5.6 mm 2
      1. 1. U69
        Height
        110 mm
        Width
        55 mm
        Depth
        12.2 mm
        Weight
        111 g
      2. 2. Camon CX
        Height
        152.8 mm
        Width
        75.8 mm
        Depth
        5.6 mm
        Weight
        150 g

      Specifications

      Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

      Everyday essentials
      Everyday essentials
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Dimensions (HxWxD)
      • 110 Х 55 Х 12.2 mm
      • 152.8 Х 75.8 Х 5.6 mm
      Weight
      • 111 g
      • 150 g
      Technology
      • TFT
      • IPS LCD
      Screen size
      • 3" inch
      • 5.5" inch
      Screen resolution
      • 240 x 400 px
      • 1080 x 1920 px
      Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded. Unknown
      • 32 GB
      • 3 GB RAM 16 GB
      • 2 GB RAM
      Memory card support
      • microSD (dedicated slot)
      • microSD
      • up to 128 GB
      BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
      • 1100 mAh
      • Removable Li-Ion
      • 3200 mAh
      • Non-removable Li-Ion
      Operating system OS
      • Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 Professional
      • Android 7.0 (Nougat)
      Chipset Unknown
      • Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)
      Headphone jack
      • Yes
      • Yes
      Display
      Display
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Touchscreen
      • resistive touchscreen
      • capacitive touchscreen
      Display colors
      • 256K
      • 16M
      Screen area
      • 25.6 cm2
      • 83.4 cm2
      Screen format
      • 5:3 (height:width)
      • 16:9 (height:width)
      Screen to body ratio
      • 42.3%
      • 72.0%
      PPI /points per inch/
      • 155 PPI
      • 401 PPI
      Screen protection Unknown
      • NEG
      Camera and Video
      Camera and Video
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Rear camera, main
      • 2 MP
      • Single
      • 16 MP
      • Single
      Camera specs
      • 2 MP
      • 16 MP
      • f/2.0
      • PDAF
      Functions Unknown
      • Dual-LED flash
      • HDR
      Video
      • No
      • 1080p@30fps
      Front camera, selfie
      • 0 MP,
      • 16 MP
      • Single
      Specifications Unknown
      • 16 MP
      • f/2.0
      • AF
      Performance
      Performance
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Processor CPU Unknown
      • Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53)
      Graphics processor GPU Unknown
      • Mali-T860MP2
      Antutu 7 scoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 38121
      GeekBench 4 Single CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 630
      GeekBench 4 Multi-CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied. Unknown
      • 2659
      General specs
      General specs
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Release date
      • 2010
      • 2017
      • March
      Colors
      • Silver
      • Grey
      • Rose Golden
      • Golden
      • Blue
      Communication and Connectivity
      Communication and Connectivity
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      SIM card
      • Mini-SIM
      • Dual SIM (Micro-SIM
      • dual stand-by)
      Network Unknown
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 -3G - HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 -4G - LTE band 1(2100)
      • 2(1900)
      • 3(1800)
      • 4(1700/2100)
      • 5(850)
      • 7(2600)
      • 8(900)
      • 20(800)
      • 28(700)
      • 40(2300)
      Speed Unknown
      • HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps
      • LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
      GPRS
      • Class 10
      • Yes
      Edge
      • Class 10
      • Yes
      Wi-Fi
      • No
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n
      • hotspot
      GPS
      • No
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS
      USB
      • 2.0
      • microUSB 2.0
      Bluetooth
      • 2.0
      • A2DP
      • 4.2
      • A2DP
      • LE
      Music and Audio
      Music and Audio
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Radio
      • FM radio
      • FM radio
      Other features
      Other features
      SpecificationU69Camon CX
      Dop
      • Sensors Accelerometer MP3/WAV/WMA/eAAC player -MP4/H.264 player -Organizer -Document viewer -Voice memo -Predictive text input
      • Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted)
      • accelerometer
      • proximity
      • compass - Charging 5V/2A 10W

      Similar comparisons