HP Elite x3 vs Vertu Signature Touch (2015)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Elite x3: 30 g lighter

  Elite x3:

  195 g

  Signature Touch (2015):

  225 g

• Width

  Signature Touch (2015): 9.5 mm narrower

  Elite x3:

  83.5 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  74 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Signature Touch (2015): 0.76 in smaller diagonal

  Elite x3:

  5.96 in

  Signature Touch (2015):

  5.2 in

• Chipset

  Elite x3:

  Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm)

  Signature Touch (2015):

  Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)

• Depth

  Elite x3: 3 mm thinner

  Elite x3:

  7.8 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  10.8 mm

• Height

  Signature Touch (2015): 6.8 mm shorter

  Elite x3:

  161.8 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  155 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Elite x3

   Height:

   161.8 mm +6.8 mm versus Signature Touch (2015)

   Width:

   83.5 mm +9.5 mm versus Signature Touch (2015)

   Depth:

   7.8 mm

2. 2. Signature Touch (2015)

   Height:

   155 mm

   Width:

   74 mm

   Depth:

   10.8 mm +3 mm versus Elite x3

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Elite x3

   Screen diagonal:

   5.96 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   97.9 cm²

2. 2. Signature Touch (2015)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   74.5 cm²

Elite x3 has approximately 31.4% more rectangular screen area than Signature Touch (2015).

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.