HP iPAQ h6325 vs Nokia E52

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Nokia E52 is 92 g lighter than HP iPAQ h6325.

  HP iPAQ h6325 — Weight: 190 g. Nokia E52 — Weight: 98 g.

• Width

  Nokia E52 is 25.6 mm narrower than HP iPAQ h6325.

  HP iPAQ h6325 — Width: 74.6 mm. Nokia E52 — Width: 49 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia E52 is 1.1 in smaller than that of HP iPAQ h6325.

  HP iPAQ h6325 — Screen diagonal: 3.5 in. Nokia E52 — Screen diagonal: 2.4 in.

• Depth

  Nokia E52 is 10.9 mm thinner than HP iPAQ h6325.

  HP iPAQ h6325 — Depth: 20.8 mm. Nokia E52 — Depth: 9.9 mm.

• Height

  Nokia E52 is 21.6 mm shorter than HP iPAQ h6325.

  HP iPAQ h6325 — Height: 137.6 mm. Nokia E52 — Height: 116 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for HP iPAQ h6325 is 2004. The recorded release year for Nokia E52 is 2009.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. HP iPAQ h6325

   Height:

   137.6 mm +21.6 mm versus Nokia E52

   Width:

   74.6 mm +25.6 mm versus Nokia E52

   Depth:

   20.8 mm +10.9 mm versus Nokia E52

   Weight:

   190 g

2. 2. Nokia E52

   Height:

   116 mm

   Width:

   49 mm

   Depth:

   9.9 mm

   Weight:

   98 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. HP iPAQ h6325

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Nokia E52

   Screen diagonal:

   2.4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   17.8 cm²

HP iPAQ h6325 has approximately 112.7% more rectangular screen area than Nokia E52.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.