HTC J vs Mitac MIO 8380

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightJ: 6 g lighterJ: 137 g · MIO 8380: 143 g
• WidthMIO 8380: 14 mm narrowerMIO 8380: 52 mm · J: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalMIO 8380: 2.1 in smaller diagonalMIO 8380: 2.2 in · J: 4.3 in
• DepthJ: 20.5 mm thinnerJ: 9.5 mm · MIO 8380: 30 mm
• HeightMIO 8380: 34.5 mm shorterMIO 8380: 97 mm · J: 131.5 mm
• Release year2012 / 2003J: 2012 · MIO 8380: 2003

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. J

   Height

   131.5 mm+34.5 mm versus MIO 8380

   Width

   66 mm+14 mm versus MIO 8380

   Depth

   9.5 mm

   Weight

   137 g

2. 2. MIO 8380

   Height

   97 mm

   Width

   52 mm

   Depth

   30 mm+20.5 mm versus J

   Weight

   143 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. J 4.3 in · 16:9 About 51 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. MIO 8380 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.