i-mate JAM vs Xolo Cube 5.0

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthJAM: 13 mm narrowerJAM: 58 mm · Cube 5.0: 71 mm
• Screen diagonalJAM: 2.2 in smaller diagonalJAM: 2.8 in · Cube 5.0: 5 in
• DepthCube 5.0: 11.1 mm thinnerCube 5.0: 6.9 mm · JAM: 18 mm
• HeightJAM: 35 mm shorterJAM: 108 mm · Cube 5.0: 143 mm
• Release year2004 / 2015JAM: 2004 · Cube 5.0: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. JAM

   Height

   108 mm

   Width

   58 mm

   Depth

   18 mm+11.1 mm versus Cube 5.0

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. Cube 5.0

   Height

   143 mm+35 mm versus JAM

   Width

   71 mm+13 mm versus JAM

   Depth

   6.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. JAM 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Cube 5.0 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Cube 5.0 has approximately 183.9% more rectangular screen area than JAM.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.