i-mate JAMin vs Xolo Opus HD

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthJAMin: 13 mm narrowerJAMin: 58 mm · Opus HD: 71 mm
• Screen diagonalJAMin: 2.19 in smaller diagonalJAMin: 2.8 in · Opus HD: 4.99 in
• DepthOpus HD: 10.3 mm thinnerOpus HD: 7.9 mm · JAMin: 18.2 mm
• HeightJAMin: 35 mm shorterJAMin: 108 mm · Opus HD: 143 mm
• Release year2006 / 2014JAMin: 2006 · Opus HD: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. JAMin

   Height

   108 mm

   Width

   58 mm

   Depth

   18.2 mm+10.3 mm versus Opus HD

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. Opus HD

   Height

   143 mm+35 mm versus JAMin

   Width

   71 mm+13 mm versus JAMin

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. JAMin 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Opus HD 4.99 in · 16:9 About 68.6 cm² rectangular area

Opus HD has approximately 182.7% more rectangular screen area than JAMin.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.