i-mate PDA2 vs Nokia 702T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Nokia 702T is 63 g lighter than i-mate PDA2.

  i-mate PDA2 — Weight: 190 g. Nokia 702T — Weight: 127 g.

• Width

  Nokia 702T is 8.6 mm narrower than i-mate PDA2.

  i-mate PDA2 — Width: 69 mm. Nokia 702T — Width: 60.4 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia 702T is 1.04 in smaller than that of i-mate PDA2.

  i-mate PDA2 — Screen diagonal: 3.5 in. Nokia 702T — Screen diagonal: 2.46 in.

• Depth

  Nokia 702T is 9 mm thinner than i-mate PDA2.

  i-mate PDA2 — Depth: 19 mm. Nokia 702T — Depth: 10 mm.

• Height

  Nokia 702T is 12.9 mm shorter than i-mate PDA2.

  i-mate PDA2 — Height: 130 mm. Nokia 702T — Height: 117.1 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for i-mate PDA2 is 2004. The recorded release year for Nokia 702T is 2011.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. i-mate PDA2

   Height:

   130 mm +12.9 mm versus Nokia 702T

   Width:

   69 mm +8.6 mm versus Nokia 702T

   Depth:

   19 mm +9 mm versus Nokia 702T

   Weight:

   190 g

2. 2. Nokia 702T

   Height:

   117.1 mm

   Width:

   60.4 mm

   Depth:

   10 mm

   Weight:

   127 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. i-mate PDA2

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   37.9 cm²

2. 2. Nokia 702T

   Screen diagonal:

   2.46 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   18.7 cm²

i-mate PDA2 has approximately 102.4% more rectangular screen area than Nokia 702T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.