Icemobile Apollo 3G vs Palm Treo 270

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Apollo 3G: 53 g lighter

  Apollo 3G:

  100 g

  Treo 270:

  153 g

• Width

  Apollo 3G: 6.5 mm narrower

  Apollo 3G:

  64.5 mm

  Treo 270:

  71 mm

• Depth

  Apollo 3G: 8.6 mm thinner

  Apollo 3G:

  12.4 mm

  Treo 270:

  21 mm

• Height

  Treo 270: 2.5 mm shorter

  Apollo 3G:

  110.5 mm

  Treo 270:

  108 mm

• Release year

  Apollo 3G:

  2014

  Treo 270:

  2003

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Apollo 3G

   Height:

   110.5 mm +2.5 mm versus Treo 270

   Width:

   64.5 mm

   Depth:

   12.4 mm

2. 2. Treo 270

   Height:

   108 mm

   Width:

   71 mm +6.5 mm versus Apollo 3G

   Depth:

   21 mm +8.6 mm versus Apollo 3G

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Apollo 3G

   Screen diagonal:

   2.6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.1 cm²

2. 2. Treo 270

   Treo 270: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.