Icemobile Apollo Touch vs Plum Trigger Plus III

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• ChipsetMediatek MT6515 / Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm)Apollo Touch: Mediatek MT6515 · Trigger Plus III: Mediatek MT6572M (28 nm)
• Release year2012 / 2015Apollo Touch: 2012 · Trigger Plus III: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Apollo Touch

   Height

   Unknown

   Width

   Unknown

   Depth

   Unknown

   Weight

   Unknown

   Unavailable dimensions are omitted from the drawing.

2. 2. Trigger Plus III

   Height

   117.8 mm

   Width

   61.5 mm

   Depth

   10.5 mm

   Weight

   97.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Apollo Touch 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Trigger Plus III 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.