Jolla Jolla vs Nokia 3.1

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalJolla: 0.7 in smaller diagonalJolla: 4.5 in · 3.1: 5.2 in
• ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm)Jolla: Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) · 3.1: Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm)
• Depth3.1: 1.2 mm thinner3.1: 8.7 mm · Jolla: 9.9 mm
• HeightJolla: 15.3 mm shorterJolla: 131 mm · 3.1: 146.3 mm
• Release year2013 / 2018Jolla: 2013 · 3.1: 2018

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Jolla

   Height

   131 mm

   Width

   68 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm+1.2 mm versus 3.1

   Weight

   141 g

2. 2. 3.1

   Height

   146.3 mm+15.3 mm versus Jolla

   Width

   68.7 mm

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   138.3 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Jolla 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 3.1 5.2 in · 18:9 About 69.8 cm² rectangular area

3.1 has approximately 25% more rectangular screen area than Jolla.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.