Lava A50 vs Lava Iris 406Q

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  A50: 1.1 mm narrower

  A50:

  63.4 mm

  Iris 406Q:

  64.5 mm

• Depth

  A50: 0.6 mm thinner

  A50:

  9.7 mm

  Iris 406Q:

  10.3 mm

• Release year

  A50:

  2016

  Iris 406Q:

  2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A50

   Height:

   123 mm

   Width:

   63.4 mm

   Depth:

   9.7 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. Iris 406Q

   Height:

   124 mm

   Width:

   64.5 mm +1.1 mm versus A50

   Depth:

   10.3 mm +0.6 mm versus A50

   Weight:

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A50

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. Iris 406Q

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.