You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<

Lava A55 vs O2 Cosmo

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

Lava A55

Lava A55

Replace A55
Remove A55
O2 Cosmo

O2 Cosmo

Replace Cosmo
Remove Cosmo
+ Add a third phone

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

  • WidthCosmo: 1.4 mm narrowerCosmo: 62 mm · A55: 63.4 mm
  • Screen diagonalCosmo: 1.6 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · A55: 4 in
  • DepthA55: 3.3 mm thinnerA55: 9.7 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm
  • HeightCosmo: 12 mm shorterCosmo: 111 mm · A55: 123 mm
  • Release year2016 / 2006A55: 2016 · Cosmo: 2006

Physical size

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

Front
A55: 123 × 63.4 mm 1 Cosmo: 111 × 62 mm 2
Side
A55: 123 × 9.7 mm 1 Cosmo: 111 × 13 mm 2
  1. 1. A55
    Height
    123 mm
    Width
    63.4 mm
    Depth
    9.7 mm
    Weight
    Unknown
  2. 2. Cosmo
    Height
    111 mm
    Width
    62 mm
    Depth
    13 mm
    Weight
    130 g

Specifications

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Everyday essentials
Everyday essentials
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Dimensions (HxWxD)
  • 123 Х 63.4 Х 9.7 mm
  • 111 Х 62 Х 13 mm
Weight
  • 0 g
  • 130 g
Technology
  • TFT
  • TFT
Screen size
  • 4" inch
  • 2.4" inch
Screen resolution
  • 480 x 800 px
  • 240 x 320 px
Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
  • 8 GB
  • 1 GB RAM
  • 64 MB RAM
  • 128 MB ROM
Memory card support
  • microSD
  • up to 32 GB
  • microSD (dedicated slot)
BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
  • 1550 mAh
  • Removable Li-Ion
  • 0 mAh,
Operating system OS
  • Android 6.0 (Marshmallow)
  • Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone
Chipset Unknown
  • TI OMAP 850
Headphone jack
  • Yes
  • No
Display
Display
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Touchscreen
  • capacitive touchscreen
Unknown
Display colors
  • 16M
  • 65K
Screen area
  • 45.5 cm2
  • 17.8 cm2
Screen format
  • 5:3 (height:width)
  • 4:3 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio
  • 58.4%
  • 25.9%
PPI /points per inch/
  • 233 PPI
  • 167 PPI
Camera and Video
Camera and Video
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Rear camera, main
  • 5 MP
  • Single
  • 1.3 MP
  • Single
Camera specs
  • 5 MP
  • 1.3 MP
Functions
  • LED flash
  • panorama
Unknown
Video
  • Yes
  • Yes
Front camera, selfie
  • 0.3 MP
  • Single
  • 0 MP,
Specifications
  • VGA
Unknown
Performance
Performance
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Processor CPU
  • Quad-core 1.2 GHz
  • 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S
General specs
General specs
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Release date
  • 2016
  • November
  • 2006
  • September
Colors
  • Black + Silver
Unknown
Battery life
  • Stand by time- Up to 388 h Talking time- Up to 9 h
  • Stand by time- Up to 200 h Talking time- Up to 4 h
Communication and Connectivity
Communication and Connectivity
SpecificationA55Cosmo
SIM card
  • Dual SIM
  • Mini-SIM
Network
  • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
Unknown
Speed
  • HSPA
Unknown
GPRS
  • Yes
  • Class 10
Edge
  • Yes
  • Class 10
Wi-Fi
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
  • hotspot
  • Wi-Fi 802.11b
GPS
  • Yes
  • with A-GPS
  • No
USB
  • microUSB 2.0
  • miniUSB
Bluetooth
  • 2.1
  • EDR
  • 2.0
Music and Audio
Music and Audio
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Radio
  • FM radio
  • No
Others Unknown
  • HTC JOGGR touch-sensitive navigation bar
Other features
Other features
SpecificationA55Cosmo
Dop
  • Sensors Accelerometer For India
  • Infrared port - MP3/AAC player -Pocket Office -Predictive text input -Organizer - HTC Excalibur platform

Similar comparisons