Lava A67 vs Meizu C9 Pro

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonal

  A67: 0.45 in smaller diagonal

  A67:

  5 in

  C9 Pro:

  5.45 in

• Depth

  A67: 0.5 mm thinner

  A67:

  9.2 mm

  C9 Pro:

  9.7 mm

• Release year

  A67:

  2016

  C9 Pro:

  2018

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A67

   Height:

   145.5 mm

   Width:

   72 mm

   Depth:

   9.2 mm

2. 2. C9 Pro

   Height:

   146.2 mm

   Width:

   71.2 mm

   Depth:

   9.7 mm +0.5 mm versus A67

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A67

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. C9 Pro

   Screen diagonal:

   5.45 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   18:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   76.7 cm²

C9 Pro has approximately 11.2% more rectangular screen area than A67.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.