Lava A77 vs Xolo Q900T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonal

  A77: 0.2 in smaller diagonal

  A77:

  4.5 in

  Q900T:

  4.7 in

• Chipset

  A77:

  Spreadtrum SC9832

  Q900T:

  Mediatek MT6589T (28 nm)

• Release year

  A77:

  2017

  Q900T:

  2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A77

   Height:

   135 mm

   Width:

   67.2 mm

   Depth:

   9.5 mm

   Weight:

   140 g

2. 2. Q900T

   Height:

   133.8 mm

   Width:

   67.6 mm

   Depth:

   9.3 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A77

   Screen diagonal:

   4.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   55.8 cm²

2. 2. Q900T

   Screen diagonal:

   4.7 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   60.9 cm²

Q900T has approximately 9.1% more rectangular screen area than A77.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.