Lava Flair E2 vs Palm Treo 600

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Treo 600: 1 mm narrower

  Flair E2:

  61 mm

  Treo 600:

  60 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Treo 600: 1 in smaller diagonal

  Flair E2:

  3.5 in

  Treo 600:

  2.5 in

• Depth

  Flair E2: 10 mm thinner

  Flair E2:

  12 mm

  Treo 600:

  22 mm

• Release year

  Flair E2:

  2015

  Treo 600:

  2003

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Flair E2

   Height:

   113 mm

   Width:

   61 mm +1 mm versus Treo 600

   Depth:

   12 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. Treo 600

   Height:

   112 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   22 mm +10 mm versus Flair E2

   Weight:

   168 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Flair E2

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   36.5 cm²

2. 2. Treo 600

   Screen diagonal:

   2.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.2 cm²

Flair E2 has approximately 80.9% more rectangular screen area than Treo 600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.