Lava Iris 350m vs Plum Axe Plus

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthIris 350m: 3.1 mm narrowerIris 350m: 62 mm · Axe Plus: 65.1 mm
• Screen diagonalIris 350m: 0.5 in smaller diagonalIris 350m: 3.5 in · Axe Plus: 4 in
• HeightIris 350m: 11 mm shorterIris 350m: 118 mm · Axe Plus: 129 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Iris 350m

   Height

   118 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   10.2 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Axe Plus

   Height

   129 mm+11 mm versus Iris 350m

   Width

   65.1 mm+3.1 mm versus Iris 350m

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   112 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Iris 350m 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Axe Plus 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

Axe Plus has approximately 24.8% more rectangular screen area than Iris 350m.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.