Lava Iris 400s vs O2 XDA Guide

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  O2 XDA Guide is 10.5 mm narrower than Lava Iris 400s.

  Lava Iris 400s — Width: 64 mm. O2 XDA Guide — Width: 53.5 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of O2 XDA Guide is 1.2 in smaller than that of Lava Iris 400s.

  Lava Iris 400s — Screen diagonal: 4 in. O2 XDA Guide — Screen diagonal: 2.8 in.

• Depth

  Lava Iris 400s is 4.3 mm thinner than O2 XDA Guide.

  Lava Iris 400s — Depth: 10.2 mm. O2 XDA Guide — Depth: 14.5 mm.

• Height

  O2 XDA Guide is 23 mm shorter than Lava Iris 400s.

  Lava Iris 400s — Height: 125 mm. O2 XDA Guide — Height: 102 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Lava Iris 400s is 2014. The recorded release year for O2 XDA Guide is 2008.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Lava Iris 400s

   Height:

   125 mm +23 mm versus O2 XDA Guide

   Width:

   64 mm +10.5 mm versus O2 XDA Guide

   Depth:

   10.2 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. O2 XDA Guide

   Height:

   102 mm

   Width:

   53.5 mm

   Depth:

   14.5 mm +4.3 mm versus Lava Iris 400s

   Weight:

   102 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Lava Iris 400s

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. O2 XDA Guide

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Lava Iris 400s has approximately 87.6% more rectangular screen area than O2 XDA Guide.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.