Lava Iris 400s vs Philips 968

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width968: 15.3 mm narrower968: 48.7 mm · Iris 400s: 64 mm
• DepthIris 400s: 14.8 mm thinnerIris 400s: 10.2 mm · 968: 25 mm
• Height968: 30 mm shorter968: 95 mm · Iris 400s: 125 mm
• Release year2014 / 2005Iris 400s: 2014 · 968: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Iris 400s

   Height

   125 mm+30 mm versus 968

   Width

   64 mm+15.3 mm versus 968

   Depth

   10.2 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. 968

   Height

   95 mm

   Width

   48.7 mm

   Depth

   25 mm+14.8 mm versus Iris 400s

   Weight

   128 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Iris 400s 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 968 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.