Lava Iris 401e vs Philips W8568

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Iris 401e: 81 g lighter

  Iris 401e:

  133 g

  W8568:

  214 g

• Depth

  Iris 401e: 8.8 mm thinner

  Iris 401e:

  10 mm

  W8568:

  18.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Iris 401e

   Height:

   124 mm

   Width:

   63 mm

   Depth:

   10 mm

2. 2. W8568

   Height:

   123.5 mm

   Width:

   63 mm

   Depth:

   18.8 mm +8.8 mm versus Iris 401e

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Iris 401e

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. W8568

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   44.1 cm²

Iris 401e has approximately 3.2% more rectangular screen area than W8568.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.