Lava X28 vs Sharp Aquos R2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthAquos R2: 4 mm narrowerAquos R2: 74 mm · X28: 78 mm
• Screen diagonalX28: 0.5 in smaller diagonalX28: 5.5 in · Aquos R2: 6 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualX28: Single · Aquos R2: Dual
• Release year2016 / 2018X28: 2016 · Aquos R2: 2018

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. X28

   Height

   155 mm

   Width

   78 mm+4 mm versus Aquos R2

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Aquos R2

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   74 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   181 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. X28 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Aquos R2 6 in · 19:9 About 89.9 cm² rectangular area

Aquos R2 has approximately 7.8% more rectangular screen area than X28.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.