Lava X50 Plus vs Nokia 2.3

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthX50 Plus: 3.6 mm narrowerX50 Plus: 71.8 mm · 2.3: 75.4 mm
• Screen diagonalX50 Plus: 0.7 in smaller diagonalX50 Plus: 5.5 in · 2.3: 6.2 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualX50 Plus: Single · 2.3: Dual
• HeightX50 Plus: 2.7 mm shorterX50 Plus: 155 mm · 2.3: 157.7 mm
• Release year2016 / 2019X50 Plus: 2016 · 2.3: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. X50 Plus

   Height

   155 mm

   Width

   71.8 mm

   Depth

   8.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. 2.3

   Height

   157.7 mm+2.7 mm versus X50 Plus

   Width

   75.4 mm+3.6 mm versus X50 Plus

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   183 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. X50 Plus 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 2.3 6.2 in · 19:9 About 95.9 cm² rectangular area

2.3 has approximately 15.1% more rectangular screen area than X50 Plus.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.