Lava X50 vs Motorola A920

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  A920: 11.5 mm narrower

  X50:

  71.5 mm

  A920:

  60 mm

• Depth

  X50: 15.5 mm thinner

  X50:

  8.5 mm

  A920:

  24 mm

• Height

  X50: 5 mm shorter

  X50:

  143 mm

  A920:

  148 mm

• Release year

  X50:

  2016

  A920:

  2003

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. X50

   Height:

   143 mm

   Width:

   71.5 mm +11.5 mm versus A920

   Depth:

   8.5 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. A920

   Height:

   148 mm +5 mm versus X50

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   24 mm +15.5 mm versus X50

   Weight:

   212 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. X50

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. A920

   A920: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.