Lenovo A536 vs Nokia E51

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE51: 48 g lighterE51: 100 g · A536: 148 g
• WidthE51: 26 mm narrowerE51: 46 mm · A536: 72 mm
• Screen diagonalE51: 3 in smaller diagonalE51: 2 in · A536: 5 in
• DepthA536: 2 mm thinnerA536: 10 mm · E51: 12 mm
• HeightE51: 24.8 mm shorterE51: 114.8 mm · A536: 139.6 mm
• Release year2014 / 2007A536: 2014 · E51: 2007

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A536

   Height

   139.6 mm+24.8 mm versus E51

   Width

   72 mm+26 mm versus E51

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   148 g

2. 2. E51

   Height

   114.8 mm

   Width

   46 mm

   Depth

   12 mm+2 mm versus A536

   Weight

   100 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A536 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E51 2 in · 4:3 About 12.4 cm² rectangular area

A536 has approximately 456.4% more rectangular screen area than E51.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.