Lenovo K800 vs Nokia E65

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE65: 46 g lighterE65: 115 g · K800: 161 g
• WidthE65: 22.2 mm narrowerE65: 49 mm · K800: 71.2 mm
• Screen diagonalE65: 2.3 in smaller diagonalE65: 2.2 in · K800: 4.5 in
• DepthK800: 4.5 mm thinnerK800: 11 mm · E65: 15.5 mm
• HeightE65: 25.5 mm shorterE65: 105 mm · K800: 130.5 mm
• Release year2012 / 2007K800: 2012 · E65: 2007

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. K800

   Height

   130.5 mm+25.5 mm versus E65

   Width

   71.2 mm+22.2 mm versus E65

   Depth

   11 mm

   Weight

   161 g

2. 2. E65

   Height

   105 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm+4.5 mm versus K800

   Weight

   115 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. K800 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E65 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area

K800 has approximately 272.5% more rectangular screen area than E65.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.