Lenovo K900 vs Nokia E50

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE50: 58 g lighterE50: 104 g · K900: 162 g
• WidthE50: 34.5 mm narrowerE50: 43.5 mm · K900: 78 mm
• Screen diagonalE50: 3.4 in smaller diagonalE50: 2.1 in · K900: 5.5 in
• DepthK900: 8.6 mm thinnerK900: 6.9 mm · E50: 15.5 mm
• HeightE50: 44 mm shorterE50: 113 mm · K900: 157 mm
• Release year2013 / 2006K900: 2013 · E50: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. K900

   Height

   157 mm+44 mm versus E50

   Width

   78 mm+34.5 mm versus E50

   Depth

   6.9 mm

   Weight

   162 g

2. 2. E50

   Height

   113 mm

   Width

   43.5 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm+8.6 mm versus K900

   Weight

   104 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. K900 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E50 2.1 in · 4:3 About 13.7 cm² rectangular area

K900 has approximately 510.6% more rectangular screen area than E50.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.