LG Candy vs Motorola XT810

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Candy: 13 g lighter

  Candy:

  152 g

  XT810:

  165 g

• Width

  XT810: 16.2 mm narrower

  Candy:

  73.2 mm

  XT810:

  57 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XT810: 1.8 in smaller diagonal

  Candy:

  5 in

  XT810:

  3.2 in

• Depth

  Candy: 10.4 mm thinner

  Candy:

  8.2 mm

  XT810:

  18.6 mm

• Height

  XT810: 36.4 mm shorter

  Candy:

  146.3 mm

  XT810:

  109.9 mm

• Release year

  Candy:

  2018

  XT810:

  2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Candy

   Height:

   146.3 mm +36.4 mm versus XT810

   Width:

   73.2 mm +16.2 mm versus XT810

   Depth:

   8.2 mm

2. 2. XT810

   Height:

   109.9 mm

   Width:

   57 mm

   Depth:

   18.6 mm +10.4 mm versus Candy

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Candy

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. XT810

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   28.2 cm²

Candy has approximately 144.1% more rectangular screen area than XT810.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.