LG Optimus Chic E720 vs Samsung S5690 Galaxy Xcover

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover: 32 g lighter

  Optimus Chic E720:

  132 g

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  100 g

• Width

  Optimus Chic E720: 8 mm narrower

  Optimus Chic E720:

  57.9 mm

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  65.9 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Optimus Chic E720: 0.45 in smaller diagonal

  Optimus Chic E720:

  3.2 in

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  3.65 in

• Depth

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover: 0.9 mm thinner

  Optimus Chic E720:

  12.9 mm

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  12 mm

• Height

  Optimus Chic E720: 9 mm shorter

  Optimus Chic E720:

  112.5 mm

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  121.5 mm

• Release year

  Optimus Chic E720:

  2010

  S5690 Galaxy Xcover:

  2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Optimus Chic E720

   Height:

   112.5 mm

   Width:

   57.9 mm

   Depth:

   12.9 mm +0.9 mm versus S5690 Galaxy Xcover

2. 2. S5690 Galaxy Xcover

   Height:

   121.5 mm +9 mm versus Optimus Chic E720

   Width:

   65.9 mm +8 mm versus Optimus Chic E720

   Depth:

   12 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Optimus Chic E720

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   30.5 cm²

2. 2. S5690 Galaxy Xcover

   Screen diagonal:

   3.65 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   39.7 cm²

S5690 Galaxy Xcover has approximately 30.1% more rectangular screen area than Optimus Chic E720.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.