LG Optimus Q2 LU6500 vs Philips W736

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Optimus Q2 LU6500: 20.5 g lighter

  Optimus Q2 LU6500:

  147 g

  W736:

  167.5 g

• Height

  Optimus Q2 LU6500: 3.6 mm shorter

  Optimus Q2 LU6500:

  123 mm

  W736:

  126.6 mm

• Release year

  Optimus Q2 LU6500:

  2011

  W736:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Optimus Q2 LU6500

   Height:

   123 mm

   Width:

   65 mm

   Depth:

   12.3 mm

2. 2. W736

   Height:

   126.6 mm +3.6 mm versus Optimus Q2 LU6500

   Width:

   65.4 mm

   Depth:

   12.1 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Optimus Q2 LU6500

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. W736

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.