LG Optimus T vs Nokia E6

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalE6: 0.74 in smaller diagonalE6: 2.46 in · Optimus T: 3.2 in
• DepthE6: 2.8 mm thinnerE6: 10.5 mm · Optimus T: 13.3 mm
• HeightOptimus T: 2 mm shorterOptimus T: 113.5 mm · E6: 115.5 mm
• Release year2010 / 2011Optimus T: 2010 · E6: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Optimus T

   Height

   113.5 mm

   Width

   59 mm

   Depth

   13.3 mm+2.8 mm versus E6

   Weight

   129 g

2. 2. E6

   Height

   115.5 mm+2 mm versus Optimus T

   Width

   59 mm

   Depth

   10.5 mm

   Weight

   133 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Optimus T 3.2 in · 3:2 About 30.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E6 2.46 in · 4:3 About 18.7 cm² rectangular area

Optimus T has approximately 62.7% more rectangular screen area than E6.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.